Tuesday, October 5, 2010

Our Wild and Crazy Legal System

Another prison inmate is pissed off about the lack of free dental care he feels he has a right to.  Embezzler, identity thief, credit card thief and most notably, convicted murderer and body dismemberer, Dennis Gaene has filed a federal lawsuit over his lack of dental care in the North Dakota State penitentiary. 

Dennis wanted a root canal and a crown after he broke his tooth on a piece of shell while eating a breaded oyster. He’s claiming that pulling his tooth, instead of repairing it, violates his Constitutional rights regarding cruel and unusual punishment.

When a criminal steals an identity, murders the individual whose identity he’s stolen and then uses the murdered victims’ own credit cards to purchase various and sundry items to dispose of the victims dismembered remains, you just can’t be surprised when that same criminal expects someone else to pay for his expensive dental needs.

What is surprising, is that we as a nation allow this sort of crap to continue to clog up our judicial system and cost the taxpayer’s money. 

The Maven would like to point out that a current Major insurance carrier for the employees of our Federal Government does not provide benefits for root canals, crowns or dentures.  It will, however, pay for removal of teeth.  Despite the shortcomings of our government it can be stated with confidence that the majority of our Fed Employees are not murderers.  That a convicted murderer should expect better health benefits than the average hard working, law abiding citizen is pure lunacy. And the legal system that entertains these asinine lawsuits from prisoners is out of whack.


14 comments:

  1. Jack fell down and broke his crown and now he's doing life in state penn for murder and dismemberment.

    I hope Jack suffers with his broken crown for a long time to come.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think we should dismember his mouth. But I tend to be fairly radical on this subject.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I bet he'll keep filing for whatever else he can imagine. He's got nothing but time. Sickening.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm sure a "generous" inmate will give him QUITE THE ROOT CANAL !!!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Eh...give him the death penalty, then his tooth won't bother him.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So basically you should hold off on your dental work until you have quite a bit to do and then commit a felony.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Candy: Couldn't agree more!

    Mother: I think Dennis has begun that process himself.

    Goddess: Unfortunately, I believe you're correct. What else has he got to do with all that time?

    Heff: Yes, I'm sure there's plenty of drilling and filling that goes on in the Big House!

    Skunk: Ahhh, but death is too easy for him...but torture? That could take his mind off of his tooth.

    Captain: It's fast becoming the American way. Have someone else pay for it!

    ReplyDelete
  8. I really wish people wouldn't dismember their victims. It makes for very unpleasant trials.

    ReplyDelete
  9. I can't believe we spend time arguing about a tooth with this inmates when there are 70 million Americans who probably still don't have basic dental. Too bad he's not in Texas. And... breaded oyster? Really?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Wacky, wacky! CA spends more on prisons than just about anything else in its budget.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Of course he does not deserve a root canal, I wonder the details, however I am not sure if would be fair to deny someone arrested for an ounce of pot (mind the effects on the tooth) or copyrighting a movie, a root canal, after all even folks who have not been convicted of a crime and innocent can be remanded in jail for a year, the duke rape case, if they were poor and needed a root canal, would it be fair to deny it.

    Folks who do take care of the teeth, end up needing root canals for one or two teeth.

    I am not sure if the state took the easy way out but what if a root canal still left bacteria, it could be worse, then a bigger suit

    ReplyDelete
  12. There is one caveat that no one has addressed. Sometimes a root canal can save taxpayers money. For example I have provided a root canal (abutment tooth) on an existing bridge where removing the tooth and bridge would create serious problems for the prison dentist. In other words, care should be cost efficient for the taxpayer and the system. Sometimes the root canal is indicated.

    For all intents and purposes, prison dental care should be basic public health dentistry. This notion that inmates should be restored to complete dental health (after years of neglect) is bogus. I am also a firm believer that an extraction is definitive treatment particularly for molar teeth. If you came into the system without teeth (after years of being edentoulous) prison dentists should not be forced to make an inmate an immediate denture or partial.

    An inmate should receive only basic dental care to address pain and infection. If Dennis wants a root canal and crown maybe he ought to pay for it himself (and the guard escort to the private dentist).

    ReplyDelete
  13. It would probably take a blasting drill to take care of this human pig's tooth. The prison should just do what this water buffalo vomit did to Tim Wicks and cut his bloated, twinkie-stuffed blubber head clean off. It's disgusting that this fat pig is on the taxpayers backs when he should've been a barbecued whale in the electric chair.

    ReplyDelete

C'mon, chime in. You made it this far.